June 15, 2022
We are as frustrated as you are with The Swamp and its current political theater.
We would like to share with you some videos taken from prior Congressional hearings. Congress knows the voting machines are capable of altering votes and are easily hacked.
Ask yourself while you watch them: How is it that voting machine fraud and election security became "crazy" concepts only when Trump lost and raised the issues?
For two decades prior to 2020, Congress and many Democrats frequently spoke of voting machines being able to alter votes and election outcomes, and they heard sworn testimony about all of it, including algorithms.
While many of you, our wonderful supporters included, already realize this blatant Uniparty hypocrisy and their lies, many others still can't see it. Show them:
For once, we agree with then-Senator Kamala Harris: We must move back to paper ballots!
Among the members of Congress who heard his sworn testimony were Jerry Nadler and Maxine Waters. In this short clip, Mr. Curtis also explains algorithms can be written so that they disappear.
1- There have been so many bald-faced, provable lies told with straight faces in the last week that we wanted to offer you some facts on the matter.
Read the whole thing, available at the link. Pass this along to those in your orbit.
January 6 for Non-Dummies
QUOTE: The January 6 committee is pure political theater intended to crush the MAGA movement once and for all. And like so many attempts before—the Russian collusion hoax, the first impeachment trial, the stolen 2020 election, the second impeachment trial—Democrats and the media are successfully brainwashing millions of their cult-like disciples who allow themselves to be duped time and again by the likes of Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).
Facts, as they say, do matter—and the aforementioned list is just a handful of indisputable truths related to January 6, 2021, that the other side doesn't want the American people to see. So share it widely.
2- The left tries to make you forget that they have been refusing to accept election results for decades.
Here's a Long List of Prominent Democrats Refusing to Accept Election Results
QUOTE: Democrats on Capitol Hill are holding hearings this week to examine January 6, 2021 and their allegation President Donald Trump, along with Republicans on Capitol Hill, launched an "assault on democracy" by questioning or rejecting the results of the 2020 presidential election.
Conveniently, Democrats are failing to highlight their own "assault on Democracy" over the years.
The first example is Democrat Congressman Bennie Thompson, who is leading the January 6 Committee. Thompson voted against the certification of the 2004 presidential election and refused to attend President Trump's inauguration.
Democrat Congressman Jamie Raskin, who is also a leading figure on the committee, did the same and voted against the certification of the 2016 presidential election.
Former Democratic Senator and current Vice President Kamala Harris agreed and repeatedly claimed Trump was an illegitimate president.
Twice failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton still claims the 2016 election was stolen from her and fueled the despicable lie that President Trump wasn't elected, but installed by the Russian government.
Current Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, who lost a previous race to current Republican Governor Brian Kemp, has never conceded the 2018 race.
3- Here is a debate we would actually pay to see!
D'Souza Challenges Barr to Debate Him Over Claims Contained in '2000 Mules'
QUOTE: Conservative filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza is challenging former Attorney General William Barr to a debate over the findings in D'Souza's documentary "2000 Mules" that questioned the integrity of the 2020 general election.
D'Souza threw down the gauntlet after Barr laughed when referring to the movie during a recorded deposition that was aired by the House January 6 committee Monday.
"My opinion then, and my opinion now, is that the election was not stolen by fraud," Barr said. "And I haven't seen anything since the election that changes my mind, including the '2000 Mules' movie," he added, before he began to laugh.
Committee member Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California asked Barr to provide his assessment of the documentary.
Barr responded that the Georgia Bureau of Investigation had looked into the cellphone geotracking evidence used in "2000 Mules" by the vote integrity group True the Vote — which partnered with D'Souza in making "2000 Mules" — and was "unimpressed with it."
D'Souza responded in a series of tweets, including one that called on Barr to debate him.
"I'd like to invite Bill Barr to a public debate on election fraud. Given his blithe chuckling dismissal of #2000Mules this should be easy for him. What do you say, Barr? Do you dare to back up your belly laughs with arguments that can withstand rebuttal and cross-examination?"
4- More food for thought.
QUOTE: An excuse used in the 2020 election rears its ugly head again...but this time, it goes uncorrected. There is a willful ignorance to even address it!
Is Dekalb Co. the new Antrim?
QUOTE: We all remember Antrim Co, MI from the 2020 election: the blood red county initially returned mind blowing numbers that showed Joe Biden won the contest in that county despite the overwhelming Pro Trump sentiment. But then, the following morning, someone brought this up to election officials and they quickly took down the results. From there, all hell broke lose.
QUOTE: The ensuing case, Bailey v. Antrim Co, produced a report from J. Alex Halderman titled "Analysis of Antrim County, Michigan, November 2020 Election Incident." Halderman is no stranger to Georgia voters either after he released another report, this time on Dominion ICX machines in Georgia that led the CISA to release an advisory acknowledging major vulnerabilities on the Dominion Democracy Suite software.
CISA also released a list of mitigation recommendations for these vulnerabilities that has gone wildly unacknowledged by the oblivious election officials in Georgia. It is worth noting that this report is still *sealed* from the public by Judge Amy Totenberg. Why would a report outlining vulnerabilities in our elections be concealed from the public? This in and of itself should be infuriating.
This article is going to draw similarities between the Antrim Co report and what happened in Dekalb Co but has gone relatively unchecked.