We have not talked much recently about the issues surrounding Covid-CCP. Here is an update on some aspects of the biggest lie told to the world.
Never forget, Covid-CCP was not about health. It is all about freedom and power. Some people desire the power to erase all of your freedoms.
1- This reminds us of that time Hillary Clinton could not remember anything while under oath. Rush Limbaugh famously spoofed it.
Fauci told Attorneys General for Louisiana and Missouri one hundred and seventy eight (178) times that he could NOT RECALL in response to questions.
He took a page right out of the Clinton Playbook. And sadly, that strategy works. Hillary lives free and clear to this day.
QUOTE: The Attorneys General for Louisiana and Missouri were successful in deposing Dr. Fauci last week for a lawsuit trying to identify potential First Amendment infractions by our government-censoring citizens.
The 446-page transcript was released yesterday (embedded at link) and here are some of the highlights.
We had already heard tidbits about his deposition from lawyers involved and the key takeaway was evident throughout the transcript – Dr. Fauci has a terrible memory or he is hiding WHAT he knew. He used the phrase "I don't recall" fully 178 times.
Perhaps this is a good lawyerly approach but it's awfully frustrating for many of us who have been trying to understand the origins of the wrenching interventions that have taken years off our lives.
Speaking of origins. The source of the virus was a major topic of discussion but Dr. Fauci played the fool for the stenographer and the lawyers in the room. After being pressed on the urgent emails he sent out in the wake of an article alleging a lab leak for the virus, Dr. Fauci deflected and deferred knowledge of anything to other people. He was – in the dark.
In some instances it was bewildering that he didn't know key players in this drama. Peter Daszak, the head of EcoHealth Alliance may very well had been instrumental in this entire fiasco, but Dr. Fauci downplayed that he knew him at all or even that he knew anything about the company Peter founded.
He goes on to deny that he knew anything about Shi Zhengli, the "bat lady" of Wuhan. This claim is even more incredulous in my opinion.
Dr. Fauci was asked about his opinion on masking and how it had changed over time. He claimed that by April 2, 2020 he was full on board for masking even though he couldn't cite a single study in support of this. Nor could he explain why he had sent studies in an email dated March 31st around to colleagues that refuted any benefit in masking.
This was all too much.
Suffice it to say, Dr. Fauci is a terrible liar.
2- Dr. Naomi Wolf has been at the front of the battle warning of the dangers of the Covid-CCP injections. This week she was actually allowed at her Alma Mater, Yale University, to factually beg the college not to force the injection on students. By the way, Yale is allowing the faculty to take a pass on the jab.
QUOTE: "My heart is breaking — and I'm on the verge of tears," grieved Dr. Naomi Wolf while speaking at a December 2 medical freedom rally in front of Yale University — in opposition to the Covid-19 vaccine mandate.
Yale is requiring students, most between the ages of 17 and 22, to take the bivalent booster tested on eight mice — while allowing their faculty a pass on the latest shot.
"I cannot believe that in the year 2022," Naomi continued. "After 35 years of advocacy for women's health and human rights and civil liberties, I'm standing here to say Yale University should not mandate 17-year-olds, 18-year-olds, 19-year-olds, 20-year-olds, 21-year-olds with an experimental dangerous mRNA lipid nanoparticle injection — just so they can come back to school and resume their educations! I can't believe I have to say this. But here we are."
Naomi expresses how she always believed Yale would "protect the civilization that it sought to portray — a civilization in which I learned about the Nuremberg Code here at Yale. I learned about the Geneva Conventions here at Yale. I learned about the Hippocratic oath ... here at Yale University. I cannot believe I'm standing outside these walls, saying, 'Don't coerce minors and young adults into damaging their lives and submitting to an illegal injection that violates the Geneva Conventions, that violates the Nuremberg Code, that violates the Hippocratic oath, that violates basic human rights — so these kids can pick up their education.' Don't do it."
Dr. Wolf moves on to the legalities — "or the crimes" — that they are about to commit. "I want to tell the world — if it hasn't been following, that Yale University doesn't mandate the faculty for this bivalent booster. Yale University doesn't mandate the staff for this experimental injection! It is mandating that children! It is mandating that kids, that students!"
"What you're about to do is a serious crime. It is deeply illegal. Certainly, it violates Title IX."
"I've had my babies. Women my age have had our babies ... These young women haven't had their children yet! What are you doing to them?! What are you inflicting on them?! You're violating them!" cried Dr. Wolf. "There will be 18, 19, 20-year-old members of the Class of 2023, 2024, 2025, who will not be able to conceive — and we know it from seeing the Pfizer documents. We know it. It's a fact! It's a fact. For sure, there are going to be women who will be injured reproductively for the rest of their lives. Dr. James Thorp has shown how the lipid nanoparticles traverse the placenta and damage the placenta, resulting in higher rates of miscarriage, spontaneous abortion, and stillbirths."
3- We are surprised by how many people we still see wearing masks as we go about daily life. If a mask makes someone feel better by all means wear it. Just know that there is no scientific reason to wear one, as there is not a mask made that wlll keep you clear of Covid-CCP.
QUOTE: There is new research that has been released showing that masks are ineffective, regardless of type.
And it's not just new research, it's high quality research.
The Annals of Internal Medicine just published a randomized controlled trial comparing the ability of medical masks to prevent COVID infection to fit-tested N95s.
Importantly, this trial was conducted on healthcare workers who would be most likely to use masks appropriately.
That trial design was also important as it was meant to determine whether or not N95 respirators were superior to "regular" surgical masks.
They examined 29 different health care facilities on multiple continents, from North America to Asia and Africa.
The percentage of healthcare workers testing positive for COVID in each group was tracked to determine how effective or ineffective higher-quality masking was in preventing infection.
Unsurprisingly, the results confirmed that there is essentially zero difference between surgical or N95 respirators when it comes to tests results.No matter how "high quality" your mask is, it's entirely irrelevant.
The researchers also took pains to ensure that the control and treatment groups shared as many similarities as possible.
Yet none of that mattered; there was no difference in outcomes between the medical and N95 level masks.
Even more importantly, these disappointing results were from facilities with universal masking policies in place.
This is yet another randomized controlled trial to show that masks do not work. If "The Experts™" actually cared about following "the science," or "the evidence," this would once again be the nail in the coffin for masking. More like the 40th nail in the coffin.
4- Masks don't work. Injections don't work. Lockdowns don't work.
QUOTE: How different it feels this time around. Broadcasters are lustily cheering anti-lockdown protesters in China. Members of Congress offer unqualified support. President Joe Biden, although more guarded, is sympathetic.
But the trade-offs are essentially the same in China today as they were three years ago — coronavirus deaths versus other deaths. The current unrest was sparked by a fire in Xinjiang, which was allowed to become needlessly deadly because the authorities were following COVID protocols. In other words, they were elevating COVID above other forms of harm.
Most countries did the same in 2020 with, as we now see, disastrous results. The lockdowns did not just cause an economic meltdown from which we will take years to recover. They also failed on their own terms. They killed more people than they saved.
Guess which developed country had the lowest excess mortality between 2020 and 2022. Go on, have a guess. That's right. Sweden, which refused to close shops or schools or to impose a mask mandate, saw cumulative excess deaths rise by 6.8%, the lowest figure in the OECD. By way of comparison, the equivalent figures were 18% in Australia, 24.5% in the U.K., and 54.1% in the U.S.
At this stage, various authoritarians, hypochondriacs and mask fetishists trot out bizarre arguments about Sweden having a low population density, as if Swedes were evenly spaced across their birch forests rather than living mainly in cities comparable to ours. What is striking about this argument is not so much its dishonesty (in March 2020, lockdowners claimed that Sweden faced total catastrophe, not that it might end up with a slightly higher mortality rate than Finland ) as its desperation. Across the world, we are in denial. We simply can't bring ourselves to admit that everything we went through — the disrupted education, the spike in mental health problems, the ruined careers, the debts — was for nothing. Like the countries that emerged maimed from World War One, we tell ourselves that the sacrifice must have had some purpose. Perhaps, now as then, decades will pass before we can bring ourselves to face the hideous truth.
And yet, deep down, we know it already. That is why we respond as we do to the images of the brave protesters in China. We wish we had responded the same way, even if we cannot yet acknowledge that wish to ourselves.
READ. KNOW. SHARE. PRAY.
Regardless of who wins any election, to have confidence in the outcome, we must continue to demand (1) real paper ballots, (2) hand counted in a bipartisan transparent process, and (3) citizen voter ID.
NOTE: Defending The Republic, Inc. is a §501(c)(4) non-profit organization, gifts to which are not deductible as charitable contributions for Federal income tax purposes.
Follow Our Progress: